Apple ML ★ 96 3 min

Understanding Alignment in Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Study

🔗 https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/alignment-multimodal-llms

📌 【Apple ML 研究】多模態 LLM 的對齊挑戰:解決視覺幻覺與方法論的差異

TL;DR:透過分析離線與線上對齊方法,提出無需額外標註的 BDHS 抽樣法來強化多模態對齊。

🤔 解決視覺幻覺與資訊不一致

在純語言模型(LLMs)中,對齊(Alignment)是提升表現的關鍵;但在多模態大型語言模型(MLLMs)中,這個領域的研究相對不足。MLLM 在處理圖像理解任務時,不僅會產生錯誤事實的「幻覺」(hallucination),還會出現與圖像內容不符的「不一致性」問題。因此,如何讓模型的回答與圖像資訊更緊密地對齊,成為了研究的核心目標。

🧩 拆解對齊演算法與資料建構

目前學界已有多種多模態偏好資料集(preference datasets)與對齊方法,包括 Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) 與 Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO),但由於資料集、底層模型與對齊方法的變數過多,目前尚不清楚究竟哪些要素對效能提升貢獻最大。

本研究針對多模態對齊的各個面向進行獨立分析,並得出以下發現:

  • 演算法分類與結合:將對齊演算法分為「離線(Offline,如 DPO)」與「線上(Online,如 online-DPO)」兩大類。研究指出,在特定情境下,結合離線與線上方法可以提升模型表現。
  • 資料集影響力:回顧了多種已發表的多模態偏好資料集,並探討其建構細節如何影響模型最終的效能。

📊 提出 BDHS 抽樣法,無需額外標註即可達成競爭力

為了降低對標註或外部模型的依賴,研究團隊提出了一種全新的多模態偏好資料建立方式:Bias-Driven Hallucination Sampling (BDHS)

  • 特點:不需要額外的標註(annotation)或外部模型輔助。
  • 效能:在多項基準測試(benchmarks)中,BDHS 展現出足以媲美先前已發表對齊研究的競爭力。

🎯 實務啟示

對於開發多模態模型的人來說,這項研究提示我們:在優化 MLLM 時,不一定要依賴高成本的人工標註,透過聰明設計的抽樣機制(如 BDHS)與結合不同類型的對齊演算法,可能就能在不增加標註成本的情況下,有效解決模型與圖像內容不符的幻覺問題。

🔗 來源

#MultimodalLLM #Alignment #MachineLearning #ComputerVision #NLP #DPO #Hallucination #AppleML #DeepLearning #AIResearch

原始資料 Apple ML · 收集於 2026-08-04
來源原標題
Understanding Alignment in Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Study
原始連結
https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/alignment-multimodal-llms

摘要原文

research area Computer Vision , research area Speech and Natural Language Processing content type paper published August 2026 Understanding Alignment in Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Study Authors Elmira Amirloo*, Jean-Philippe Fauconnier*, Christoph Roesmann*, Christian Kerl†, Rinu Boney†, Yusu Qian, Zirui Wang, Afshin Dehghan, Yinfei Yang, Zhe Gan, Peter Grasch View publication Copy Bibtex Preference alignment has become a crucial component in enhancing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet its impact in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) remains comparatively underexplored. Similar to language models, MLLMs for image understanding tasks encounter challenges like hallucination. In MLLMs, hallucination can occur not only by stating incorrect facts but also by producing responses that are inconsistent with the image content. A primary objective of alignment for MLLMs is to encourage these models to align responses more closely with image information. Recently, multiple works have introduced preference datasets for MLLMs and examined different alignment methods, including Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). However, due to variations in datasets, base model types, and alignment methods, it remains unclear which specific elements contribute most significantly to the reported improvements in these works. In this paper, we independently analyze each aspect of preference alignment in MLLMs. We start by categorizing the alignment algorithms into two groups, offline (such as DPO), and online (such as online-DPO), and show that combining offline and online methods can improve the performance of the model in certain scenarios. We review a variety of published multimodal preference datasets and discuss how the details of their construction impact model performance. Based on these insights, we introduce a novel way of creating multimodal preference data called Bias-Driven Hallucination Sampling (BDHS) that needs neither additional annotation nor external models, and show that it can achieve competitive performance to previously published alignment work for multimodal models across a range of benchmarks. * Authors contributed equally as first authors. † Authors contributed equally. Related readings and updates. Guiding Cross-Modal Representations with MLLM Priors via Preference Alignment September 22, 2025 research area Computer Vision conference NeurIPS Despite Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP)‘s remarkable capability to retrieve content across modalities, a substantial modality gap persists in its feature space. Intriguingly, we discover that off-the-shelf MLLMs (Multimodal Large Language Models) demonstrate powerful inherent modality alignment properties. While recent MLLM-based retrievers with unified architectures partially mitigate this gap, their reliance on coarse modality… Read more Towards Data-Centric RLHF: Simple Metrics for Preference Dataset Comparison October 23, 2024 research area Data Science and Annotation , research area Methods and Algorithms conference NeurIPS The goal of aligning language models to human preferences requires data that reveal these preferences. Ideally, time and money can be spent carefully collecting and tailoring bespoke preference data to each downstream application. However, in practice, a select few publicly available preference datasets are often used to train reward models for reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). While new preference datasets are being introduced… Read more Discover opportunities in Machine Learning. Our research in machine learning breaks new ground every day. Work with us

tencent/hy3:free 自動生成