Unsealed Briefs in Authors’ Case v. Microsoft/OpenAI
https://authorsguild.org/news/ag-v-openai-top-execs-knew-mass-book-piracy-was-illegal/📌 解封訴狀揭露:OpenAI高層明知盜版書籍違法仍執意使用
TL;DR:作者協會控告OpenAI/微軟的訴訟新解封文件顯示,公司高層早已知悉大規模盜版書籍訓練行為違法且會導致作者失業。
如果一家公司內部員工私下寫下「我們的工作會讓人失業」,還補上一句「即使有藝術家抗議,我們大概率也會忽略然後照樣發布」,這聽起來像是反烏托邦小說的臺詞,但根據最新解封的訴訟文件,這正是OpenAI政策總監在2020年內部訊息中的原話。
🤔 一起關於訓練資料來源的集體訴訟
這起案件是Authors Guild v. OpenAI,原告包括美國作家協會(Authors Guild)以及David Baldacci、John Grisham、George R.R. Martin、Jodi Picoult等多位知名作家,指控OpenAI與微軟未經授權,使用受版權保護的書籍訓練其AI模型。案件屬於在曼哈頓進行的多地區聯合訴訟(multidistrict litigation),由Susman Godfrey律所的Justin A. Nelson擔任主要律師。上週解封的簡報文件把重點放在被告公司「明知故犯」的內部證據上。
📊 內部訊息揭露的具體證詞
文件引用多段內部通訊:OpenAI政策總監Jack Clark於2020年5月表示「我們在AI與創作上的工作,會愈來愈多地取代人類勞動……我們的工作會讓人失業……即使有藝術家對此表達擔憂,我們很可能會忽略,然後照樣發布」。OpenAI於2022年聘用的Tarun Gogineni,其研究目標之一被描述為讓GPT模型「完成」George R.R. Martin未寫完的《冰與火之歌》最後兩部,並自稱即使馬丁本人早逝,「GPT-5也能替他把系列寫完」,他也將作者對資料集是「偷來的」的抗議,形容為「可接受的經濟破壞」。文件另指出,微軟早在2019年4月,透過Sam Altman與Dario Amodei向Bill Gates與微軟技術長Kevin Scott展示GPT-3早期版本時,就已被告知OpenAI使用了LibGen(一個盜版書籍與論文網站)的資料。時任OpenAI研究總監的Amodei回應LibGen「作為訓練集有點太可疑(sketchier)」,研究員Sam McCandlish則坦言自己「擔心的是觀感問題,如果『OpenAI使用來路不明的俄羅斯網站版權資料』這種新聞出現在Hacker News上,那就不妙了」。文件並描述OpenAI在2022年夏天啟動代號「Project Clear」的行動,刪除LibGen相關檔案,內部Slack訊息顯示員工討論「libgen」一詞在Google Docs、Slack、GitHub上散布的痕跡該如何處理。
⚠️ 這是原告單方陳述,案件仍在進行中
需要說明的是,以上內容均出自原告方(集體訴訟原告)提出的簡易判決動議備忘錄與事實陳述,屬於單方陳述,尚未經法院最終認定;文件顯示未來數月仍會有更多訴訟資料公開,聽證會預計於2027年初舉行,最終責任認定仍待審理結果。
🎯 實務啟示
這起案件再次凸顯訓練資料來源審查對AI團隊的重要性:模型的能力再強,若資料來源涉及已知的盜版內容,後續面對的法律與商譽風險可能遠超過訓練資料本身節省的成本。對於自建或評估基礎模型的工程團隊而言,資料集出處與授權紀錄的可追溯性,正逐漸從「合規細節」變成「核心風險項目」。
🔗 來源
- 標題:Unsealed Briefs in Authors’ Case v. Microsoft/OpenAI
- 作者/機構:Authors Guild(Hacker News 提交者:papergirl)
- 連結:https://authorsguild.org/news/ag-v-openai-top-execs-knew-mass-book-piracy-was-illegal/
#OpenAI #Microsoft #AuthorsGuild #AICopyright #LibGen #AILitigation #AIEthics #TrainingData #GenerativeAI #AIRegulation
原始資料 Hacker News · 收集於 2026-09-27
摘要原文
All News Press Releases Unsealed Briefs in Authors’ Case v. Microsoft/OpenAI: Top Execs Knew Their Mass Book Piracy Was Illegal And Would Put Authors Out of Work Added to last week’s revelations, new filings reveal OpenAI's lawless determination to do virtually anything to win the AI arms race, including using books from a “sketchy Russian website” and releasing products “that will make people unemployed” September 21, 2026 Share on Twitter (opens in a new tab) on Facebook (opens in a new tab) on Linkedin (opens in a new tab) via email (New York, September 21, 2026) Explosive new documents released last Thursday in Authors Guild v. OpenAI —the major book authors’ ongoing lawsuit alleging OpenAI and Microsoft illegally trained their products on copyrighted books—show that executives and employees at both companies intentionally broke the law and their disdain for human authorship. The brief meticulously documents AI developers’ knowledge of the damage their actions could do to authors, publishers, and American culture itself, warning that “OpenAI’s GPT models pose an existential threat to those who write and publish books.” Plaintiffs in the lawsuit include The Authors Guild, writers David Baldacci, Taylor Branch, Michael Connelly, Sylvia Day, Jonathan Franzen, Christopher Golden, Andrew Sean Greer, John Grisham, David Henry Hwang, Matthew Klam, George R.R. Martin, Jodi Picoult, Stacy Schiff, James Shapiro, and others. Their filings ( here and here ) mark a turning point in the case, putting the defendant companies’ guilty knowledge and reckless actions at the center of the narrative. Authors Guild CEO Mary Rasenberger observed, “These filings reveal shocking disdain for writers and their work through repeated, intentional decisions to steal books rather than pay for them with full knowledge that their products will destroy the careers of authors. OpenAI pursued its mass piracy scheme even in the face of clear evidence that doing so would degrade American culture by substituting human works with AI slop and would put thousands of writers out of work. We are grateful to our entire legal team for uncovering and telling this critical story.” Alongside equally scorching but separate revelations in a brief filed by news media organizations, the authors’ brief reveals: OpenAI and Microsoft Knew Their Systems Would Replace Human Writers – OpenAI Policy Director Jack Clark stated in May 2020: “Our work on AI and Creativity is going to increasingly lead to us creating systems that substitute for the labor of [] people . . . The better we do on GPT-X, the more worried genre fiction authors will become about us substituting for them on Amazon.” He then doubled down: “ Our work in this area will make people unemployed. . . There will be a point where a bunch of artists express worry about what we’re doing here and we’ll likely ignore their concerns and release anyway . . .” “Autocompleting” Other People’s Work – OpenAI hired Tarun Gogineni in 2022 to lead its efforts to improve the writing quality of its models. Gogineni stated his “research mission” was to have GPT models write the “last two books of [Martin’s] A Song of Ice and Fire” series by “finishing it one day.” Gogineni even mused that he would “rest easy knowing that even if GRRM [George R. R. Martin] dies early, GPT-5 will autocomplete his series.” “Acceptable Economic Disruption.” – “Although [Gogineni] was aware of authors’ complaints that the ‘datasets are stolen’ and that authors were losing work to AI-generated competition, he did not find those complaints ‘all that sympathetic’ and instead viewed them as ‘acceptable economic disruption.’ He wrote that the world would soon experience ‘the death of the reader’ as ‘machines creat[ed] slop for more machines.’” Microsoft Knew OpenAI Used Pirated Books from the Start – “Microsoft knew about OpenAI’s use of LibGen as early as April 2019 when Sam Altman and Dario Amodei presented an early version of GPT-3 to Bill Gates and disclosed the use of LibGen to Gates and Microsoft’s Chief Technology Officer Kevin Scott, among others.” OpenAI Feared “Optics,” Not the Law – “Dario Amodei, OpenAI’s then-Research Director, responded that ‘as a training set [LibGen is] a bit sketchier.’ [OpenAI researcher Sam] McCandlish explained: ‘I was just worried about optics – i.e. ‘openai uses copyrighted data from sketchy russian website’ showing up on [Hacker News] would be unfortunate.” They Tried to Hide the Evidence – In an effort to cover its tracks the company called “Project Clear,” OpenAI deleted its LibGen files in the summer of 2022. “On June 15, 2022, in an OpenAI Slack channel, [OpenAI Corporate Designee] Paino asked: ‘general q: how concerned are we about mentions of libgen? (they’re all over google docs/slack/github . . .). That evening, [OpenAI VP of Research Bob] McGrew wrote to Paino and Nicholas Ryder: “Given how much OpenAI is in the news, now is the right time to excise Libgen from our systems and storage. What would be involved in that?’” All quotes taken from Class Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ( Docket 1982 ) and Class Plaintiffs’ Corrected Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts ( Docket 1987 ). This briefing was filed in the class action case brought on behalf of the Authors Guild and book copyright owners, Alter v. OpenAI and Microsoft , with lead counsel Justin A. Nelson from Susman Godfrey. The case is part of multidistrict litigation against those defendants pending in Manhattan. We expect more briefing over the next couple months and a hearing in early 2027. About the Authors Guild and Authors Guild Foundation With more than 18,000 members, the Authors Guild is the nation’s oldest and largest professional organization for published writers. It advocates on behalf of working writers to protect free speech, freedom of expression, and authors’ copyrights; fights for fair contracts and authors ability to earn a livable wage; and provides a welcoming community for writers and translators of fiction, nonfiction, poetry, and journalism. Through its educational and charitable arm, the Authors Guild Foundation, it also offers free programming to teach working writers about the business of writing, as well as organizing public events that highlight the importance of a rich, diverse American literary culture and the authors who contribute to it. Become a Member Join the Guild and support our work to protect authors’ rights. Join now (583 points, 552 comments on Hacker News)
由 claude-code/sonnet 自動生成