Latent Space ★ 83 6 min

[AINews] Gemini 4 Argon: GDM’s answer to Astra/Fable, with 1M output

🔗 https://www.latent.space/p/ainews-gemini-4-argon-gdms-answer

📌 【Google DeepMind】Gemini 4 Argon 登場,衝著 Astra、Fable 而來

TL;DR:Google 推出輸出上限 1M tokens 的 Gemini 4 Argon,宣稱 19 項基準測試中拿下 13 項第一,但目前僅限受邀預覽。

GDM 上一次推出比 Flash 更大的模型是今年二月的 3.1 Pro,之後幾個月陸續只有 3.x Flash 的小改款,再加上上個月的管理層大調整,業界最大的疑問一直是 Google 何時能追上同儕已經發布的 Astra、Fable 等級模型。答案是 Gemini 4 Argon,而且一出手就帶著業界首見的百萬輸出 token 能力。

🤔 先給政府與資安團隊,一般開發者還得等

根據 Latent Space 整理的 AI News,Google DeepMind 將 Gemini 4 Argon 定位在程式開發、企業知識工作與網路防禦場景,開放對象目前僅限政府使用者與 Fairwind Program 中的受信任資安防禦團隊,Google 表示會先完善防護機制(guardrails),之後才會開放給開發者、企業與一般消費者,開放時程只說「盡快」。

🧩 Long Decode Continuation:百萬輸出 token 是怎麼做到的

Argon 最受關注的特性是輸出上限從 64K 大幅拉高到官方宣稱的 1M tokens,不過 Vals 的測試顯示實際最大輸出是 262K;Artificial Analysis 說明他們是透過一項名為 Long Decode Continuation 的新 API 功能達到 1M tokens,做法是讓長篇回應在中途暫停、再透過後續呼叫接續產生,而不是一次性吐出百萬 tokens。定價方面,標準價為每百萬 tokens 輸入 $4、輸出 $20,目前有 50% 的早鳥折扣(無截止日期),折扣後為 $2/$10,cached input 則有 95% 折扣。

📊 Google 自家公布的基準分數

Google 宣稱 Argon 在 19 項公開基準測試中有 13 項拿下第一,對比對象是 GPT-6 Astra 與 Claude Opus 5.5。以 DeepSWE 為例,Argon 得分 77.9%,Opus 5.5 為 74.2%,Astra 為 74.1%。第三方機構 Artificial Analysis 的 Intelligence Index 評測中,Argon 得分 53 分,與 GPT-6 Astra(53 分)打平,略高於 GPT-6.1 Sol(52 分)。在每任務成本上,折扣價下 Argon 每任務約 $1.99,低於 Astra 的 $3.26,但如果用標準價計算則會升到 $3.98;Artificial Analysis 特別指出,這個成本優勢來自價格而非效率本身,因為 Argon 平均每個任務要用掉 62K 個輸出 tokens,遠高於 Astra 的 27K。在 agentic 任務上,Argon 在 AutomationBench-AA 拿下第一(77.5%),但在 Terminal Bench 4 只拿 57%,落後於 Sonnet 5.5、Opus 5.5 與 Astra。幻覺率方面,Argon 在 AA-Omniscience 上為 15%,遠低於 Astra 的 51%,但代價是準確率也較低,Argon 為 50%,Astra 為 63%。另一個評測機構 Vals 則給出 Vals Index 第一名(68.9%,平均每任務 $15.68)的結果,並指出 Argon 完美完成了 30 個 Vibe Code Bench 應用,高於 Opus 5(25 個)與 Astra(24 個);Terminal-Bench 4.0 分數從前代的 19.0% 跳升到 57.6%,CyberBench 概念驗證任務拿下 70%,IOI 2024–2026 則是滿分 100%,且在 Vals Index 任務上平均只用掉 Sonnet 5.5 約四分之一的輸出 tokens。在 Arena 排名上,Argon 在 Text Arena 排名第一(1525 分),在 Code Arena WebDev 排名第八(1679 分),在 Agent Arena 初步 3000 場對戰中排名第八,但在「可操控性(steerability)」單項排名第一。PostTrainBench 分數為 45.3%,相較前代 Gemini 3.1 Pro 的 21.99% 有明顯提升。

💡 內部用例:遷移 80 萬行 C/C++ 到 Rust

Google 表示內部部署的 Argon agent 已經釋放超過 300 TiB 的資料中心記憶體,並正在將超過 80 萬行 C/C++ 核心程式碼遷移到 Rust;一個具體案例是影片解碼器,agent 用安全的 Rust 取代了 3.2 萬行 SIMD 程式碼,讓既有的 Rust 移植版本速度提升 2.7 倍,且輸出結果保持一致。Google 另外表示,建構在 Argon 上的內部 agent 迴圈協助完成了 CK 猜想的證明。

⚠️ 外界對數字的質疑不少

並非所有人都照單全收這些基準數據。有評論者指出 Argon 在 Harvey 法律基準測試上的 19.6% 落後於 Muse Spark 1.2 公布的 25.42%;也有人質疑是否存在針對偏好資料做「benchmaxxing」的情況,並對包括 DeepSWE 在內的部分數字提出異議。

🎯 實務啟示

對正在評估模型的工程團隊來說,Argon 目前最大的限制不是效能而是取得管道:預覽僅開放給政府與資安團隊,一般開發者短期內用不到。即便日後開放,從數據上看 Argon 傾向用更多輸出 tokens 換取較低的幻覺率與較高任務成功率,這種「用 tokens 換品質」的取捨對成本敏感的應用未必划算,建議等正式開放後,針對自己的任務型態實測每任務成本與 tokens 消耗量,而不是只看官方或單一評測機構公布的排行榜數字。

🔗 來源

#GeminiArgon #GoogleDeepMind #LLM #AIBenchmarks #LongContextAI #AgenticAI #GPT6 #ArtificialAnalysis #CodingAI #AIIndustry

原始資料 Latent Space · 收集於 2026-10-01
來源原標題
[AINews] Gemini 4 Argon: GDM’s answer to Astra/Fable, with 1M output
作者
Latent Space
原始標籤
blog
原始連結
https://www.latent.space/p/ainews-gemini-4-argon-gdms-answer

摘要原文

GDM last shipped a larger-than-Flash model in February ( 3.1 Pro ), and after successive incremental 3.x Flash versions and the big GDM management shakeup last month, the largest question for GDM was when they would catch up to peers who have in the meantime launched Fable and Astra class models. Well, Argon’s here , with VERY respectable benchmarks (SOTA in 13 of 19 credible benchmarks)… but only accessible in limited cybersecurity preview, though access is promised “ as soon as possible ”: We like the experimental Long Decode Continuation , which increases output tokens up to 1M as an industry first. AI News for 9/29/2026-9/30/2026. We checked 12 subreddits, 544 Twitters and no further Discords. AINews’ website lets you search all past issues. As a reminder, AINews is now a section of Latent Space . You can opt in/out of email frequencies! Gemini 4 Argon: Google Returns to the Frontier Launch : Google DeepMind introduced Gemini 4 Argon for coding, enterprise knowledge work and cyber defense ( @GoogleDeepMind , @sundarpichai ). Availability : Access starts with government users and trusted cyber defenders in the Fairwind Program. Google says it will refine guardrails before opening access to developers, enterprises and consumers ( @Google , @demishassabis ). Output limit : Google cites an industry-leading 1M-token output limit, up from 64K ( @GoogleAI , @TheRundownAI ). Measurement note : Vals lists 262K max output. Artificial Analysis reached 1M output tokens through Long Decode Continuation, a new API feature that pauses long responses and resumes them across calls ( @ValsAI , @ArtificialAnlys ). Pricing : Standard pricing is $4/$20 per 1M input/output tokens. A 50% introductory discount brings it to $2/$10, with no end date announced. Cached input gets a 95% discount ( @_philschmid , @ArtificialAnlys ). Google’s claimed results : Argon takes first place on 13 of 19 published benchmarks against GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5. On DeepSWE it scores 77.9%, versus 74.2% for Opus 5.5 and 74.1% for Astra ( @TheRundownAI ). Internal deployments : Google reports that Argon agents freed more than 300 TiB of data-center memory and are migrating more than 800K lines of C/C++ kernel code to Rust ( @kimmonismus ). Video decoder : Agents replaced 32K lines of SIMD code with safe Rust, making the existing Rust port 2.7x faster with identical output. Research use : The team says internal agent loops built on Argon helped complete the CK conjecture ( @mirrokni ). Artificial Analysis evaluation : Argon scores 53 on the Intelligence Index, matching GPT-6 Astra (53) and edging GPT-6.1 Sol (52) ( @ArtificialAnlys ). Cost per task : At discounted pricing it costs $1.99 per task versus $3.26 for Astra; standard pricing would raise this to $3.98. Token use : The savings come from price, not efficiency. Argon averages 62K output tokens per task against Astra’s 27K. Agentic work : It ranks #1 on AutomationBench-AA at 77.5% and scores 57% on Terminal Bench 4, behind Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5 and Astra. Hallucination : Its 15% rate on AA-Omniscience compares with 51% for Astra. The tradeoff is lower accuracy: 50% versus Astra’s 63% ( @aipulseda1ly ). Vals evaluation : Argon is #1 on the Vals Index at 68.9%, at an average $15.68 per task ( @ValsAI , @ValsAI ). Coding : It built 30 Vibe Code Bench apps perfectly, against 25 for Opus 5 and 24 for Astra ( @ValsAI ). Terminal and security : Terminal-Bench 4.0 rose from 19.0% to 57.6%. It scores 70% on CyberBench proof-of-concept tasks and 100% on IOI 2024–2026 ( @ValsAI ). Efficiency : It uses about a quarter of Sonnet 5.5’s output tokens on Vals Index tasks ( @ValsAI ). Arena and other evals : Argon is #1 in Text Arena at 1525 and #8 in Code Arena WebDev at 1679 ( @arena ). Agent Arena : It ranks #8 overall and #1 for steerability on a preliminary 3K sessions ( @arena ). PostTrainBench : It scores 45.3%, up from 21.99% for Gemini 3.1 Pro ( @karinanguyen ). Skepticism : Some observers questioned the published numbers. Legal benchmark : Argon’s reported 19.6% on Harvey’s legal benchmark trails Muse Spark 1.2’s listed 25.42% ( @BlackHC ). Other critiques : Commentators raised possible preference-data benchmaxxing and objected to some figures, including DeepSWE ( @teortaxesTex , @teortaxesTex ). GPT-6.1 Sol and OpenAI’s DevDay Agent Stack Independent evals : GPT-6.1 Sol is the new #1 on MathArena ( @j_dekoninck ). Code Arena : It ranks #3 on WebDev at 1759, 70 points above GPT-6 Sol for the same $2/$10 pricing ( @arena ). Cost per task : Artificial Analysis measures $0.72 per task at max effort, versus $3.26 for Astra and $1.04 for GPT-6 Sol ( @ArtificialAnlys ). Source of savings : Sol uses fewer turns and has a lower cache-read price ( @ArtificialAnlys ). Luna bug fix : OpenAI fixed an image-encoding bug, adding 1 Intelligence Index point to GPT-6 Luna. Ultrafast inference : OpenAI quotes up to 300 tok/s. SemiAnalysis reports it runs on NVIDIA GPUs at low batch sizes, not on Cerebras ( @kimmonismus ). Hands-on report : Generation is about 8x faster, but end-to-end agent tasks speed up only 2–4x because tool latency dominates ( @sayashk ). Computer use : Gains are largest here, since UI actions respond in milliseconds. Cost : The tester exhausted a weekly limit in about 2 hours. Product layer : DevDay introduced dots (persistent agents with their own cloud computers), a Decisions API and computer use ( @latentspacepod ). Sites : ChatGPT Sites can now host MCP servers and turn them into installable plugins ( @mxstbr ). Usage limits : Users report one-off credits worth about $2,500. Others complain that usage limits were cut ( @kimmonismus , @kimmonismus ). Other Releases: Embeddings, Image/Video and Open Models Perplexity contextual embeddings : pplx-embed-v2-context-9b-preview is open on Hugging Face ( @perplexity_ai ). Method : The model encodes the whole document once and pools chunk vectors afterward. Training distills relevance from a context-compression model instead of using single gold-chunk labels ( @denisyarats ). Results : It sets a new state of the art on ConTEB. On turbopuffer’s private context-bench it beats voyage-context-4 by 14.4 points in answer recall@10, using 1 KB int8 vectors against 8 KB ( @turbopuffer ). Cohere Embed 5 : The family has Pro and Fast variants in a shared embedding space, so you can index with one and retrieve with the other ( @cohere ). Fast tier : Cohere says it beats other fast-tier models by at least 6 points at a third less cost than Pro. Evaluation uses its new RCP-nDCG@10 metric ( @cohere ). Ideogram 4.5 : The editing model targets artifact-free multi-turn edits, with open weights promised ( @ideogram_ai ). Edit fidelity : Over ten consecutive edits, 94–99% of untouched content stays identical ( @fal ). Ranking : It is #18 in Image Edit Arena at 1351 ( @arena ). Video benchmark : Artificial Analysis launched AA-Video-T2V v2.0, judged at 1080p with more than 68K human votes ( @ArtificialAnlys ). Leaders : Wan 3.0 is #1 at $12/min. Seedance 2.5 is #2 at $34.12/min, and MiniMax H3 is statistically tied at $4.80/min. Utopai X : This post-train of MiniMax H3 debuts at #2 ( @ArtificialAnlys ). Ling-3.1-flash : A 500B model reported close to GPT-5.6 Sol and Opus 5 ( @kimmonismus ). It ranks #2 among open-weight models in Mobile App Arena ( @DesignArena ). Praxis-1 : Runway released an open-weight world-action model and says robotics policy performance scales predictably with third-person video ( @agermanidis ). Solar Mini 4 : Upstage reports 35B total / 3B active parameters. It scores 24 on the Intelligence Index at $0.10/$0.40 ( @ArtificialAnlys ). Caching penalty : It still costs about 5x Luna per task, because only 48% of its repeated context hits cache versus 99% for Luna ( @ArtificialAnlys ).

由 claude-code/sonnet 自動生成