DistroKid has been quietly taking down songs in response to UMG lawsuit

來源原標題

DistroKid has been quietly taking down songs in response to UMG lawsuit

作者

Terrence O’Brien

原始標籤

AI · Copyright · Entertainment · Law · Music · News · Policy

原始連結

https://www.theverge.com/entertainment/1009309/distrokid-take-down-songs-umg-lawsuit

摘要原文

Entertainment AI News DistroKid has been quietly taking down songs in response to UMG lawsuit Artists are frustrated with the lack of transparency around DistroKid removing their songs. Artists are frustrated with the lack of transparency around DistroKid removing their songs. by Terrence O'Brien Oct 10, 2026, 6:52 PM UTC Image: DistroKid Part Of All the latest in AI ‘music’ see all updates Terrence O'Brien is the Verge’s weekend editor. He’s covered the tech industry for over 18 years and knows a thing or two about synths. Artists are taking to social media to complain that DistroKid has unceremoniously removed their work without notice. Now DistroKid has confirmed to The Verge that the takedowns are a direct response to claims made by UMG. The label filed a lawsuit in September claiming that DistroKid has created an “AI-slop pipeline.” Artists are saying that their non-AI works are being caught up in the purge, however. Musician and self-described “Video Game boy” McGwire reported that six of his songs had been removed from streaming. As has been the case with others, McGwire says that there was no communication from DistroKid before or after the removals, and that he had to contact the company for an explanation. DistroKid also makes it exceedingly difficult to contact them. McGwire first had to have a “lengthy circular conversation” with a bot before getting hold of a live agent. One of the songs removed was a cover of Stevie Wonder’s “Isn’t She Lovely,” which he claims to have had a proper license for. Another track used a beat he purchased through a marketplace, which others had also licensed. Most infuriating for McGwire was a song removed for an uncleared sample. The song he allegedly sampled was released two years after his track. Much of the frustration from artists stems from the lack of communication and recourse. Nerdcore rapper Insane Ian posted that he “had an original song taken down with no warning, and they wouldn’t tell me why either.” Rapper King Chase also struggled to get through to a person at DistroKid. He told The Verge that an entire album for an artist he had been working with was removed with no communication or explanation. “The album had been up for 3-4 years without incident,” he said, and that there had been “no copyright strikes or anything either.” Amanda Ferri, DistroKid’s VP of Artist Services, told The Verge that “A very small number of recordings distributed through DistroKid have been removed in response to claims made by UMG. We strongly dispute the allegations underlying UMG’s lawsuit and regret the disruption to affected artists. We are working to minimize that disruption while protecting artists’ ability to release their music.” Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Terrence O'Brien AI Copyright Entertainment Law Music News Policy More in: All the latest in AI ‘music’ The New York Times pitted five musicians against an AI in a songwriting competition. Terrence O'Brien Oct 3 Engram is a sampler that turns broken AI hallucinations into music Terrence O'Brien Sep 27 Sony and UMG are suing Suno again Terrence O'Brien Sep 25