Anthropic News 4 min

Introducing the Life Sciences Verification Program

🔗 https://www.anthropic.com/news/life-sciences-verification-program

📌 【Anthropic】生命科學驗證計畫上線,讓 Claude 敢碰「敏感」的生物研究題目

TL;DR:Anthropic 推出 Life Sciences Verification Program,讓經驗證的機構取得更寬鬆的生物研究存取權限。

一款通用 AI 助手要在藥物開發、病原體研究這類生物領域派上用場,往往會先撞上自家的安全防護機制。Anthropic 這次選擇用「驗證身分」換取「更寬鬆權限」的方式,試著解開這個兩難。

🤔 通用安全防護,擋住了合法的生物研究

Anthropic 表示,旗下對外開放的 Fable 模型目前會封鎖不少生物科學相關的任務,涵蓋藥物開發、研究型生物學、臨床開發與製造等領域。問題在於,很多情況下很難單純從一個請求本身判斷使用者究竟是在做正當研究(例如研究病毒病原體以開發疫苗),還是意圖造成傷害(例如試圖提高病毒傳播力)。Anthropic 在最近的威脅報告中也指出,平臺上已出現愈來愈多可能協助生物武器開發的複雜濫用嘗試。

🧩 兩種授權:日常工作用 Standard,敏感專案用 High-risk

Life Sciences Verification Program(LSVP)要求申請機構先通過涵蓋研究資歷、安全標準與倫理研究監督的驗證流程,之後可以申請兩種授權:

  • Standard Use:適用於多數生物研究與開發工作流程,可授予整個團隊做多元的日常工作,每年更新一次。目前適用於 Mythos 5.1、Opus 5、Sonnet 5,並將延伸到未來的模型,分類器針對科學任務調整得更寬鬆。
  • High-risk Use:針對在 Standard Use 下仍被封鎖、風險較高的工作,會移除所有生物科學相關的封鎖限制。這類授權只對應單一研究專案,每六個月要重新申請,目前開放給 Opus 5 與 Sonnet 5,Mythos 的高風險授權則仍侷限於少數經過額外審核的機構,Anthropic 表示正與美國政府合作擴大適用範圍。

這些授權可以透過 Claude Science、Claude.ai、Claude Code 與 API 等所有產品介面使用。

💡 從即時攔截改成離線監控,抓的是「行為模式」

Anthropic 點出三種特別擔心的威脅情境:帳號或存取權被惡意軟體劫持、內部人員或被脅迫的員工惡意濫用權限,以及 AI agent 在長流程或群體協作中做出未預期的危險行為。因為嚴重的濫用行為往往被拆分成看似無關的多次請求與 session 以規避偵測,LSVP 把防護機制從「每個請求即時攔截」轉為「離線監控行為模式」,讓合法工作能更少被打斷,但也代表 Anthropic 需要保留被標記活動的相關資料以供審查。

為此,LSVP 流量會保留 30 天資料以進行監控,這些資料會被嚴格隔離,不會用於模型訓練,也不會被 Anthropic 內部生命科學研究團隊存取。每個機構的存取範圍會綁定其申請時所述的用途,一旦偵測到超出範圍的使用模式,Anthropic 會通知機構管理員,在事先約定的時限內處理與補救。其他防護機制,例如網路資安相關的分類器,則維持不變。

📊 已有數十家機構搶先加入

Anthropic 表示已透過早期存取計畫讓數十家機構加入 LSVP,並預期在開放申請的第一週內就會有數百家機構送件,未來幾週會進一步擴大到服務多數生命科學社群。來自 Xaira、Edison、Manifold Bio 等機構的研究者也表達了對這項計畫的期待,希望能把 Anthropic 的前沿模型用於藥物發現引擎等工作。

🎯 實務啟示

對在藥廠、生技新創或學術實驗室裡建構 AI 應用的工程團隊而言,LSVP 提供了一條「不必完全繞過安全機制」也能取得更高權限的路徑,但代價是機構得先通過驗證、承擔起監督自身用途範圍的責任。若你的團隊手上有原本被生成式 AI 安全機制擋下的生物研究工作流程,這類驗證計畫值得列入評估。

🔗 來源

#Anthropic #Claude #LifeSciences #DrugDiscovery #AIsafety #Biosecurity #Bioinformatics #EnterpriseAI #ResponsibleAI #AIforScience

原始資料 Anthropic News · 收集於 2026-09-17
來源原標題
Introducing the Life Sciences Verification Program
機構
Anthropic
原始標籤
Announcements
原始連結
https://www.anthropic.com/news/life-sciences-verification-program

摘要原文

Announcements Introducing the Life Sciences Verification Program Sep 17, 2026 Today, we are introducing the Life Sciences Verification Program (LSVP), which gives life science professionals access to our Mythos, Opus, and Sonnet models with a refined set of safeguards more permissive for biology-related work. We have already onboarded dozens of organizations through an early-access program, and are now opening applications to the broader life science community ( apply here ). The program is launching in beta, initially for teams and institutions. We will continue to improve the program and expand access to individual Pro and Max plans over time. The LSVP is designed to enable life science professionals to use our models across a wide range of tasks that are currently blocked in our generally available Fable models, like drug discovery, research biology, clinical development, and manufacturing. It’s built for teams of all kinds—from academic labs to startups, pharma companies, and more. Verification and access types To qualify for these grants, each applicant goes through a verification process that includes a review of their research credentials, security standards, and ethical research oversight. Once verified, teams may apply for two types of LSVP grants, “Standard Use” or “High-risk Use,” depending on their access needs. These grants can be used through all our product surfaces, including Claude Science , Claude.ai , Claude Code and the API. Standard Use grants are suitable for most life science work, including the majority of biology research and development workflows. These grants can be extended to entire teams for diverse, daily workloads, and are renewed once a year. They give those teams access to our Mythos, Opus, and Sonnet models, with refined classifiers that are more permissive for science tasks than our generally available models. Standard Use grants apply to Mythos 5.1, Opus 5, and Sonnet 5 today, and to future models as they launch. They’re specifically designed to enable the full breadth of life science activities in areas spanning basic science, R&D, supply chain and manufacturing, clinical development, quality assurance, regulatory affairs, investing and diligence, and more. Although we expect Standard Use to cover the majority of access needs, some work carries a higher potential for misuse and therefore requires additional vetting. High-risk Use is an add-on grant for teams working in areas blocked under Standard Use. It removes all safeguards that block life sciences requests. This grant applies to a single research project as opposed to a full team, and must be renewed every six months. Typically, a single researcher with dual-use work would have access to one Standard Use grant for diverse, daily activities, and one or more High-risk Use grants which only apply to work on specific projects (for example, characterizing how one specific family of viral vectors is recognized by human immune pathways). High-risk grants for Claude Opus 5 and Claude Sonnet 5 are available today. We are working with the US government to make high-risk grants more broadly available for Claude Mythos, but at the time of this launch they will remain limited to a small set of entities with additional vetting. All other safeguards, such as cyber classifiers, will remain in place under LSVP grants. Enabling trusted access through shared responsibility As we’ve shown in our recent threat report , there are increasingly sophisticated misuse attempts happening on our platform, including attempts that could support biological weapons development. In biology, where it’s often not possible to differentiate between a user doing valid work (e.g. research a viral pathogen to develop vaccines against it) and pursuing harm (e.g. trying to increase the transmissibility of a virus maliciously), the most concerning threat models are ones where valid access has been diverted or overtaken by an actor with bad intent. Indeed, insider threats and rogue-use have been major factors in significant biosafety incidents and scares. In developing the LSVP’s safeguards, we aimed to protect against three concerning threat models in particular: Access compromise: Malware or account takeover diverting access to a bad actor Insider threats: Rogue or coerced employees intentionally taking malicious action or diverting their access to a bad actor Agent misuse: Agents, especially working in swarms or over long-horizon tasks, taking unintended dangerous actions In order to defend against these threats and in close collaboration with enterprise CISOs, we designed the new LSVP safeguards around the concept of shared responsibility by monitoring usage against the intended use-case for the model access. Because we vet the LSVP organizations for their life sciences credibility and oversight, we can empower them to specify for themselves what constitutes safe usage for teams or projects within their program. Each entity’s access is tied to the use cases it has specified in its grant applications, and we continuously monitor LSVP traffic to identify usage or patterns that are outside the stated safe scope. Should unauthorized activity occur, we can flag these cases to organization admins to take action within pre-agreed timeframes for triaging and remediating incidents. The use cases should include high-level descriptions of the intended work, like one would share in a job listing, and not include any sensitive information or IP. How monitoring works in LSVP Serious misuse is often spread across many requests and sessions to look disconnected and evade detection. In the LSVP, we are shifting safeguards from real-time blocking, where we reject potentially harmful access at the time of each request, to offline monitoring, which allows us to more clearly identify potential misuse across patterns of behavior. Shifting enforcement from real-time blocking to offline monitoring allows legitimate work to proceed with fewer interruptions, but it requires us to retain data associated with flagged activity for review. For LSVP traffic, we are requiring data retention for 30 days to be able to do this monitoring effectively. This data is strictly compartmentalized and cannot be used for model training or accessed by members of Anthropic’s life sciences research teams. For organizations that qualify, we are also working to understand how LSVP can integrate with features from our Enterprise Frontier Safeguards (EFS) systems. What researchers are saying Xaira is making biology more computable, generating biological data at unprecedented scale and building foundation models of cell, protein and disease biology that turn it into the next generation of life-changing medicines. We’re excited to put Anthropic's frontier models to work across our drug discovery engine, and we believe pairing trusted access with intelligence is the right way to realize AI’s promise in biology. Edison’s mission is to accelerate science and the discovery and development of new medicines. With the Life Sciences Verification Program, we are excited to be able to bring Anthropic’s most intelligent models to bear on these problems. We look forward to collaborating with Anthropic further to end disease and improve the lives of patients everywhere. At Manifold Bio, we’re building a massively parallel interface into living systems to enable powerful AI to create medicines. We look forward to putting frontier intelligence to work safely in our engine, and we welcome Anthropic’s approach of pairing access with accountability. 01 / 03 Applications and availability Organizations interested in joining the LSVP can submit an application here . We expect to enroll hundreds of organizations within the first week, and to scale the program further to support the majority of the life science community in the coming weeks. Today, LSVP is available in our first-party console for API usage, as well as in Claude for Enterprise and Team plans.

由 claude-code/sonnet 自動生成