Anthropic News Anthropic ★ 121 5 min

Claude discovers a novel enzyme system with CRISPR-like repeats

Science

🔗 https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-discovers-novel-enzyme-system

📌 【Anthropic】Claude 21 小時自主發現類 CRISPR 新酶系統

TL;DR:Anthropic 新設立的生命科學實驗室讓 Claude 自主搜尋 DNA 資料庫,發現一套帶有類 CRISPR 重複序列的全新酶系統。

CRISPR、限制酶、Taq polymerase,這些改寫生物醫學史的工具,最初都只是某位科學家在浩瀚基因體資料裡「覺得哪裡怪怪的」。如今,這份「覺得怪」的直覺被交給了一群 AI agent,而且只花了 21 小時。

🤔 背景:從人類直覺到 AI 協作的生物發現

Anthropic 在 2026 年春天成立了新的生命科學研究團隊與實驗室,目標是驗證通用 AI 模型能否系統化並加速生物學發現。文章回顧了幾個歷史案例:限制酶在細菌免疫系統中被發現後催生了整個生技產業;Taq polymerase 在黃石公園溫泉的細菌中被找到,成為 PCR 技術的基礎;CRISPR 最早只是細菌 DNA 中一段不尋常的重複序列,如今已成為基因編輯藥物的基礎。這個團隊想做的,就是把這種「發現」的過程系統化。

🧩 怎麼做的:把探索基因體資料庫的工作交給 Claude

研究團隊給 Claude 的指令很簡單:搜尋龐大的 DNA 序列資料庫,找出反轉錄酶(reverse transcriptase,RT,一種把 RNA 複製成 DNA 的酶)中有趣的新例子。除了最初的 prompt 與後續的實驗室工作,中間的分析過程幾乎全由 Claude agent 自主完成:篩選 RT 家族、調查基因體鄰近序列,並依自己的判斷挑出值得關注的候選對象。

團隊描述的典型工作流程是:Claude 先針對特定蛋白家族做文獻回顧,用公開資料重現既有研究結果以驗證方法;接著搜尋沒有已知功能描述的家族成員或基因體鄰近序列,為每個候選對象寫一份人類可讀的報告,提出可能功能並附上證據;後續分析階段,Claude 會批判性地檢視這些證據,大多數候選對象在這一步就被淘汰。一輪搜尋可能只留下一個值得測試的候選,也可能一個都沒有。能通過篩選的候選,才會進入實驗室,由人類科學家表現蛋白質並做生化與結構分析,Claude 則協助解讀數據。

📊 數據:950 個 agent、210 萬 token,找到一個異常重複序列

這次搜尋動用約 950 個 agent、耗費 210 萬 token,花了 21 小時。其中一個 agent 發現了一個異常之處:某個外觀奇特的 RT 基因旁邊,存在一段重複的 DNA 序列模式。進一步分析與實驗室測試後,團隊確認這是一套先前未被描述過的酶系統,存在於感染細菌的病毒(噬菌體)中,命名為 array-associated reverse transcriptases,簡稱 ART。整體而言,Claude agent 共蒐集超過 20 萬個 RT,篩選出 3,500 個新候選系統,再縮小到 20 個最值得分析的候選對象並產出人類可讀報告。團隊指出,這類分析對一位資深科學家而言,通常需要數週到數月的工作量。

💡 深入分析:為什麼這個發現值得注意

ART 系統的特徵組合(伴隨一段非編碼 DNA 重複序列陣列,加上一個功能未知的附屬蛋白)過去只在少數幾個系統中一起出現過,而這些系統無一例外都具備可編程、能執行切割、複製、貼上 DNA 等操作的能力。值得注意的是,這個 RT 本身在先前的研究中已被鑑定過,但 Claude 似乎是第一個注意到它與重複序列陣列、附屬蛋白共同構成一套完整系統的研究者。CRISPR 基因編輯技術先驅、MIT 暨 Broad Institute 教授 Feng Zhang 在審閱預印本後表示,這是 AI agent 對生物學發現做出貢獻的令人興奮的例子,RNA 重複陣列與反轉錄酶的關聯性確實值得進一步研究。

⚠️ 限制:功能仍未知,這只是起點

團隊坦言,目前仍不清楚 ART 系統的實際功能,相關研究仍在進行中。他們選擇提前公開這項發現,一方面展示 Claude 的能力,另一方面也讓外界了解實驗室正在進行的工作方向。所有實驗室工作僅涉及 BSL-1 與 BSL-2 等較低生物安全等級,不處理會感染人類的病原體,且全數由人類科學家執行。

🎯 實務啟示

這個案例展示了一種新的科研協作模式:AI agent 負責大量、重複性的資料篩選與假說生成,人類科學家則專注於審核候選對象與實驗室驗證。對於處理大規模非結構化資料庫的研究團隊而言,「先讓 AI 寫出可驗證的候選報告,再由人類把關」的工作流程,或許比單純要 AI「給答案」更務實。

🔗 來源

#AI4Science #Anthropic #Claude #CRISPR #SyntheticBiology #Bioinformatics #EnzymeDiscovery #ReverseTranscriptase #AIAgents #GenomeMining

原始資料 Anthropic News · 收集於 2026-09-23
來源原標題
Claude discovers a novel enzyme system with CRISPR-like repeats
機構
Anthropic
原始標籤
Science
原始連結
https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-discovers-novel-enzyme-system

摘要原文

Science Claude discovers a novel enzyme system with CRISPR-like repeats Sep 23, 2026 We’re introducing a new life sciences research group and laboratory at Anthropic. Our focus is on fundamental biology research using Claude: exploring datasets of DNA to identify uncharacterized protein families, generating hypotheses at scale, and testing them through experiments in the lab. This post introduces the team behind this work and shares early results in which Claude discovered a novel enzyme system with properties reminiscent of CRISPR, with only high-level direction from our scientists. Many discoveries that have revolutionized biology and medicine started with a scientist noticing something odd in the staggering diversity of molecular machines found in nature. Restriction enzymes , proteins that cut DNA at specific short sequences , were found in bacterial immune systems, where they destroy the DNA of invading viruses. Researchers realized they could use these enzymes to cut DNA at chosen places and splice genes from one organism into another, which launched the biotechnology industry. Taq polymerase, an enzyme that copies DNA at high temperatures, was identified in a bacterium in a Yellowstone hotspring. It became the basis for PCR, the DNA-copying method used in much of modern diagnostics. CRISPR was first noticed as an unusual repeat sequence in the DNA of certain bacteria, and is now the foundation of gene editing-based medicines. In the spring of 2026, we formed a research group to see whether general AI models can systematize and accelerate such discoveries . We believe that this acceleration will come from establishing a new way of doing biology research, in which agents collaborate with humans in every step of the process. Developing this new way of working required that we build our own lab and a single team working on everything from training Claude in biology to running experiments in the lab. Today, we’re sharing early results from one of our first research programs, in which Claude autonomously discovered a novel enzyme system that is associated with an array of DNA repeats, a pattern reminiscent of CRISPR. Although we don’t yet know its function, the system that Claude discovered has a set of characteristics that have only ever been found together in a handful of other systems, all of which are programmable and perform operations like cutting, copying, and pasting DNA. Beyond CRISPR, which has already transformed science and medicine, several other such systems are now in development as promising tools. The system that Claude found is based on a reverse transcriptase (RT), enzymes that copy RNA into DNA. While this underlying RT, found in a jumbo phage, had been identified in previous studies, Claude appears to be the first to notice the system’s defining features—an associated array of non-coding DNA sequences and an additional accessory protein of unknown function. After reviewing the pre-print, Feng Zhang, one of the pioneers of CRISPR genome editing and a professor at MIT and the Broad Institute said: This is an exciting example of how AI agents can contribute to biological discovery. The identification of RNA-repeat arrays associated with reverse transcriptases is genuinely intriguing and merits further investigation. I hope this work encourages more scientists to explore how AI can support their research. We gave Claude a prompt to search through a massive database of DNA sequences for interesting new examples of RTs. Our involvement was limited to the initial prompt and the lab work, while Claude agents combed through the database, investigated the distinct RT families, and used their own judgement to identify interesting candidates. After 21 hours spent searching this data by roughly 950 agents using 210 million tokens, one of the agents spotted something remarkable: a repeating pattern of DNA sequences that occurs next to the gene for an odd-looking RT. After further analysis and testing in our lab, we recognized that this pattern marked a previously uncharacterized enzyme system found in bacteriophages (the viruses that infect bacteria) that we call array-associated reverse transcriptases (ART). Our work to understand the primary function of ARTs is ongoing. However, we think it is important to share such findings early, both to demonstrate Claude’s capabilities and to give the broader community insight into what we’re working on. We have released a pre-print ( here ) that discusses this in more detail. About our lab We are a team of scientists who have spent our careers exploring unusual proteins, and specialize in using computational approaches to systematically read DNA, interpret its evolution, and pick out biological systems for further characterization. Our research prior to joining Anthropic has helped to better understand the evolution and regulation of CRISPR systems, discover new enzymes for next-generation cell and gene therapies , and build tools for accelerating the identification of anomalies in DNA, such as human pathogenic variants. We are part of Anthropic’s life sciences organization, alongside teams whose work includes drug discovery, and training Claude in biology and chemistry. Our lab, located in the Bay Area, looks like a typical molecular biology lab. We do research that involves only the lower-levels of the biosafety risk level (BSL-1 and BSL-2) and we do not handle pathogens that can infect humans. All of the lab work is performed by human scientists. Although we’ve experimented with using AI to accelerate lab work with initiatives like the Model Hardware Standard , this approach is less conducive to the sort of ad hoc workflows that are involved in our molecular biology research. How we work Many of our workflows involve having Claude search through the vast collection of DNA sequences associated with proteins without a known function. One typical pattern begins with a survey of a given protein family. Claude reads the relevant literature and reproduces the established results from public data to check its methods. It then searches for family members or genomic neighbors that fit no described system, and writes a short, human-readable report for each candidate that proposes a function and describes the evidence supporting its claims. In follow-up analyses, Claude critically evaluates the evidence—typically most candidates are eliminated at this stage. A survey may end with a single candidate worth testing, or with none. When a candidate survives our review, we test it in the laboratory, expressing the protein in standard laboratory strains and characterizing it biochemically and structurally, with Claude helping to interpret the data. We do our work in Claude Science and Claude Code , the same tools available to any scientist, and sometimes with a harness of our own that coordinates many Claude sessions running in parallel. Because Claude produces hypotheses so prolifically, the hypotheses themselves have become an object of study for us. With hundreds to thousands of candidate reports from a single campaign, we have been asking what distinguishes the proposals we judge worth testing from those we set aside. What we learn goes back into the instructions we give Claude and teaches it to mimic our own scientific taste. Claude finds ART In the past few years, researchers have discovered many more reverse transcriptases (RTs), most of them in bacteria, where they act as part of the immune system. Nearly all RT families were found by genomic analysis, or genome mining, which requires researchers to search sequence databases for genes that no one has characterized, notice the unusual ones, and work out what they do. Claude agents gathered over 200,000 RTs, picked out 3,500 new candidate systems, and narrowed those to the 20 most-compelling candidates that they analyzed to produce human-readable reports. For an expert scientist, this type of analysis can take weeks to months of work.

由 claude-code/sonnet 自動生成