How Comcast and Booz Allen use Claude Mythos to find exploit chains and secure their codebases
https://claude.com/resources/articles/how-comcast-booz-allen-use-claude-mythos-to-secure-their-codebases📌 Comcast、Booz Allen怎麼用Claude Mythos揪出攻擊鏈
TL;DR:Claude Mythos幫資安團隊把分散的小漏洞串成完整攻擊鏈,而非只抓單點問題。
單獨看,每個漏洞都「看起來沒事」;但真正的攻擊往往是把好幾個不起眼的小缺陷串起來,走出一條通往重大問題的路。這正是傳統資安工具的盲點——而Anthropic這篇文章描述的,是兩家組織怎麼用Claude Mythos模型去補上這個缺口。
🤔 從Project Glasswing到擴大版的CVP
Anthropic今年早些時候推出Project Glasswing,一個限量名額的計畫,讓負責保護全球關鍵基礎設施的防禦方搶先用上進階資安能力。本週,Anthropic進一步推出擴大版的Cyber Verification Program(CVP),讓更多符合資格的資安專業人員能用上進階資安能力與較寬鬆的封鎖分類器。參與Project Glasswing的組織普遍反映同一個現象:現有工具能在單一程式裡找到單一漏洞,但「攻擊鏈」——把幾個個別來看不嚴重的弱點串起來、形成通往嚴重後果的路徑——卻很難靠傳統方法追蹤。Claude Mythos類模型的作用,就是把程式碼、設定與應用程式實際運行行為拼在一起看,同時抓出單檔案的一般bug,以及只在元件互動時才會浮現的跨系統漏洞。
🧩 Comcast:找出真正可被利用的那一個
Comcast用Claude Mythos Preview在一次涵蓋258個業務關鍵系統、約1.7億行程式碼的評估中,在一個公開平臺上找到一個嚴重的身分驗證漏洞,攻擊者本可藉此繞過驗證機制——該漏洞在觀察到任何被利用的跡象之前就已經修復。Comcast的EVP、資訊安全與產品隱私長Noopur Davis表示:「發現正在變得更快、更容易,找到的問題數量非常龐大,而驗證這些大量發現,正成為新的瓶頸。」這個發現的關鍵在於Claude Mythos Preview能跨整個複雜軟體生態系統推理,而不是逐個檔案、逐個元件分別評估。該漏洞並非由單一有缺陷的元件造成,而是源自多個系統與假設之間的互動——這些假設各自獨立檢視時看起來都沒問題。Davis進一步指出:「前沿AI模型讓大規模產生發現變得容易許多,但一個發現要經過驗證確認背後問題真實存在,才能算是漏洞;而一個漏洞要能在目標環境中真正被利用,才算得上可被利用。」Comcast工程師針對實際運行中的應用程式驗證了這個發現、確認問題在實務中可被觸及,接著追查根因、完成修復,並確認該漏洞在修復前並未遭到利用。
🧩 Booz Allen:把散落的弱點串成攻擊鏈
Booz Allen為國防、公民、國家安全與商業任務打造並部署技術,其資安團隊致力縮小AI驅動攻擊者與傳統防禦手段之間的速度差距。Booz Allen的資安評估通常有固定的時間窗口,工程師能讀的原始碼、設定檔與編譯後軟體有限;而單純擴大覆蓋範圍並不能解決問題,因為真正的攻擊通常是把程式碼、設定、身分權限與部署環境裡的小弱點串起來,靠人工在大型軟體組合裡逐一追蹤這些連結非常緩慢,即使是老手也一樣。Booz Allen的AI工程副總裁Sahil Sanghvi表示:「Mythos令人意外之處,在於它能跨越邊界推理,而不只是找出孤立的程式碼問題,它幫忙把應用程式行為、設定、身分、權限與部署環境串接成一套連貫的資安假設。」這項工作從發現推進到修復的速度,也比團隊預期更快,模型還協助起草修復方案、整理證據交給負責該系統的工程師。其中一個案例是:裝置開機時、作業系統載入前執行的程式碼,負責決定裝置該鎖定還是清除資料,而這個判斷依賴儲存在機器上的一個安全金鑰;但這個金鑰一直處於未受保護狀態,導致本該被它限制的作業系統反而能換上攻擊者控制的金鑰,再餵給機器它會信任的指令,讓攻擊者能無限期拖延鎖定或清除的步驟,使遺失、被偷或遭入侵的裝置始終保持可存取狀態。這個過程中原本有好幾個能鎖住金鑰的機會,卻全都被錯過:金鑰第一次被儲存時,本該啟用的保護設定被關閉;負責把它寫入硬體的程式碼原封不動把這個設定帶過去;另一個原本可以事後鎖住金鑰的防護機制也從未被啟用。Claude Mythos透過追蹤這一個設定在兩套用不同語言寫成的程式之間的流轉,確認始終沒有任何環節把金鑰鎖上,才找出這個漏洞。Booz Allen國家資安總裁Brad Medairy補充:「Mythos能快速建立大量候選發現,但團隊仍需要驗證發現、去除重複的系統性模式,並把問題分配給正確的負責人。一位分析師在12天內審查了138個程式庫、涵蓋8個生產系統;若沒有Mythos,同等規模的組合評估靠更大的團隊也要花上好幾個月。」他也表示:「我們的研究顯示,前沿模型有能力自主執行完整的cyber kill chain,組織必須持續進行資安審查與防禦,才能跟上這個速度。」
💡 AI讓「發現」變快,「驗證」才是新瓶頸
兩個案例有個共同主軸:前沿AI模型讓找出潛在問題的速度與數量大幅提升,但這也把壓力轉移到驗證端——判斷一個發現是否真的構成漏洞、是否真能在目標環境被利用。Claude Mythos類模型的價值,在於能跨程式碼、設定與實際運行行為維持上下文去推理,抓出單獨檢視時看不出來的跨系統互動問題;但去重、驗證、交派給正確的系統負責人,仍是人力判斷的環節。
⚠️ 這是客戶證言,技術實作細節有限
文章主要以Comcast與Booz Allen兩位主管的訪談與案例描述為主,並未公開Claude Mythos本身的模型架構或技術實作細節,讀者應將其視為實務應用案例,而非技術規格說明。
🎯 實務啟示
對守護關鍵基礎設施或大型軟體組合的團隊而言,這些案例指出一個可行動的方向:把AI模型用在擴大攻擊鏈層級的推理覆蓋範圍,同時保留人工驗證、去重與責任分派的把關角色,並考慮從一次性評估轉向持續性的資安審查節奏,以對應前沿模型帶來的攻擊與防禦速度變化。
🔗 來源
- 標題:How Comcast and Booz Allen use Claude Mythos to find exploit chains and secure their codebases
- 作者/機構:Anthropic
- 連結:https://claude.com/resources/articles/how-comcast-booz-allen-use-claude-mythos-to-secure-their-codebases
#ClaudeMythos #Anthropic #CyberSecurity #ExploitChain #ProjectGlasswing #AIforSecurity #VulnerabilityManagement #Comcast #BoozAllen #CriticalInfrastructure
原始資料 Claude Blog · 收集於 2026-10-07
摘要原文
Earlier this year, Anthropic launched Project Glasswing , a limited access program to give defenders of the world’s critical infrastructure a head start on securing their codebases. This week, we launched a new, expanded version of our Cyber Verification Program (CVP) that makes advanced cyber capabilities and reduced blocking classifiers available to qualifying security professionals. As part of Project Glasswing , organizations defending critical infrastructure have put Claude Mythos models to work on the systems they defend. Across these organizations, one theme emerged: while existing cybersecurity tools can identify single vulnerabilities in a silo, exploit chains, where an attacker links several individually minor weaknesses into a path to something serious, are much harder to trace. Models like Claude Mythos help piece together code, configuration, and live application behavior so that organizations can catch both ordinary single-file bugs and the sophisticated cross-system vulnerabilities that only appear when components interact. We spoke with security leaders from Comcast and Booz Allen who participated in the program about what Claude Mythos-class models found in their environments and how it’s changing the way their teams defend against attacks. Comcast: Separating findings from exploitable vulnerabilities Comcast, a global media and technology company, used Claude Mythos Preview to identify a critical authentication vulnerability in a public-facing platform during an assessment covering 258 business-critical systems and approximately 170 million lines of code. The issue could have allowed an attacker to bypass authentication controls and was remediated before any evidence of exploitation was observed. “Discovery is becoming faster,” said Noopur Davis, EVP, Chief Information Security and Product Privacy Officer, Comcast. “Discovery is becoming easier. The volume of findings is enormous. Validation of these volumes of findings is the new bottleneck." The finding emerged from Claude Mythos Preview's ability to reason across a complex software ecosystem rather than evaluating individual files or components in isolation. The vulnerability was not caused by a single defective component. Instead, it arose from the interaction of multiple systems and assumptions that appeared correct when reviewed independently. By maintaining context across code, configuration, and application behavior, Claude Mythos Preview identified a security gap that emerged across multiple interacting components, making it difficult to detect through conventional approaches. “Frontier AI models are making it much easier to generate findings at scale,” said Davis. “But a finding becomes a vulnerability only after validation confirms the underlying issue, and a vulnerability becomes exploitable only when it can actually be exploited in the target environment.” Comcast engineers validated the finding against the running application and confirmed that the underlying security issue could be reached in practice. The team then traced the root cause, implemented remediation, and verified that the vulnerability had not been exploited prior to being fixed. The finding was representative of a broader pattern observed: some of the highest-impact issues identified by Claude Mythos-class models emerged not from individual coding errors, but from subtle interactions across complex software environments. “Early access probably accelerated our understanding of the security capabilities of frontier AI models by about a year,” Davis said. “We really appreciate the community that Anthropic has built around this program - it allows participants to share lessons learned, thus helping the wider ecosystem.” Booz Allen: Piecing together exploit chains Booz Allen builds and deploys technology for defense, civil, national security, and commercial missions, and its cyber practice works to close the speed gap between AI-powered adversaries and traditional cyber defenses. This includes running red-team exercises and building defenses for customers facing AI-enabled adversaries. Booz Allen’s security assessments run for a fixed period of time, and engineers can read only so much source code, configuration, and compiled software before they end. Wider coverage alone wouldn't close that gap, because real attacks usually work by chaining small weaknesses across code, configuration, identity, and deployment settings, and tracing those connections by hand across a large software portfolio is slow even for a skilled operator. Booz Allen used Claude Mythos Preview to review far more software than a short engagement window would normally allow, and to identify weaknesses that could be strung together into exploit chains. “Mythos was surprising in its ability to reason across boundaries rather than only identify isolated code issues,” said Sahil Sanghvi, Vice President of AI Engineering at Booz Allen. “It helped connect application behavior, configuration, identity, permissions, and deployment context into coherent security hypotheses.” The work also moved from discovery to remediation faster than his team expected, with the model helping to draft fixes and assemble evidence for the engineers who owned the affected systems. In one case, a Claude Mythos-class model found a flaw in the code that runs when a device first powers on, before the operating system loads. That code decides whether the device should lock itself or erase its data, and it makes that call using a security key stored on the machine. The key had been left unprotected, so the operating system it was meant to restrain could swap in a key an attacker controlled and then feed the machine instructions it would trust. An attacker could hold off the lock-or-erase step indefinitely, keeping a lost, stolen, or compromised device fully accessible when it should have shut itself down. There were several opportunities for the system to lock the key, and each was missed. When the key was first saved, the setting that would have protected it was switched off. The code that wrote it to the hardware passed that setting along without correcting it. A separate safeguard that could have locked the key afterward was never turned on. Claude found the vulnerability by following that one setting through two different programs written in two different languages, then confirming that nothing ever locked the key. “Mythos can create a large candidate set quickly, but teams still need to validate findings, deduplicate systemic patterns, and route issues to the right owners,” said Brad Medairy, President of National Cybersecurity, Booz Allen. "One analyst reviewed eight production systems across 138 repositories in twelve days. Without Mythos, a portfolio review at that scale would have taken us several months with a larger team." For Booz Allen, that points to a different way of running security review, one where operators keep the judgment calls while the model extends how much of the portfolio they can keep under watch. “Our research shows that frontier models have the ability to autonomously execute the full cyber kill chain,” Medairy said. “Organizations must operate continuous cyber security reviews and defenses to keep pace.” What’s next As models with the capabilities of Claude Mythos become part of everyday security work, organizations can examine their own systems the way a skilled attacker would, tracing how code, configuration, and legacy components interact and closing the gaps between them before anyone else finds a way through. We built Project Glasswing to give defenders that capability first, and we’ll keep expanding access via our new Cyber Verification Program (CVP) so that more of the organizations running critical software can put it to work. Learn more about the Cyber Verification Program (CVP).
由 claude-code/sonnet 自動生成